Nope! The next step after your accreditation visit isn’t using the major recommendations to update your improvement plan. I wish I had understood this earlier. I really wish I had. Why?
(1) Because our insufficient shared understanding of school improvement in terms of purpose slowed us down.
(2) Because we found out too late that we were getting nominal change at best because we hadn’t addressed the root causes of a given recommendation like insufficient staffing and faulty assumptions and misunderstandings regarding the improvement goal.
(3) Because our insufficient shared understanding of what helps/hinders progress resulted in us being less effective and less efficient.
(4) Because our lack of defining what “done” looked like left us pursuing a fuzzy understanding of success.
Photo by David Pisnoy on Unsplash
Instead of 2 steps (completing the visit and starting on the plan), I wish had used the following 4 steps:
Step 1: Complete accreditation visit, including an after action review.
Step 2: Collaboratively review, refine, and ensure understanding and use of our improvement engine: purpose, perspective, process, plan, and practices (see also School Improvement Reflection Protocol).
Step 3: Collaboratively create a scope statement for each major recommendation. This statement defines the…
- Recommendation, commentary, and relevant indicators.
- People directly involved.
- User-friendly title we’re going to use to refer to this recommendation.
- Root causes of the recommendation, for example, unhelpful mindsets.
- Value to be created in terms of institutional effectiveness and in terms of people flourishing.
- Operating assumptions. For example, if the goal is curriculum development, this would be our operating assumptions about curriculum (see ChatGPT prompt below).
- Things that help/hinder us.
- Accountability structures.
- Key deliverables—these are the results/outcomes that we expect to see and that help us define what “done” looks like.
- Average time investment needed per person.
- Who’s involved in developing the improvement plan.
Though it takes time to develop a scope statement, it will actually save you time in the long run. “[P]rojects [improvement goals/plans] seldom fail at the end. Rather, they fail during the definition phase” (Fundamentals of Project Management, loc 520). It takes far less time to develop a scope statement than to clean up and/or redo a failure.
Note: The above scope statement description is a modified version of what project managers generally use and reflects that schools create improvement plans that include things others may include in scope statements—things like timeline, budget, and milestones. To see sample templates for scope statements, click here.
ChatGPT Prompt for Step 3.A: Operating Assumptions: Act as a consultant for international Christian schools. We have an improvement plan on _____. We want to troubleshoot the assumptions our plan is based on. Give 20 possible assumptions, each of which is followed by 3 alternative assumptions and ways to address those alternative assumptions. This means a total of 20 possible assumptions and 60 alternative assumptions, OK? |
Step 4: Develop an improvement plan that is aligned with the scope statement.
For Step 2, I wish that we had gathered together and discussed key questions about our improvement engine, for example:
- What’s our school improvement engine?
- How well do staff and leaders understand and use it?
- What revisions might be good to make before we start working on our major recommendations?
For Step 3, I wish we had gathered together to discuss key questions about a given recommendation, for example:
- What’s the major recommendation? What commentary was provided? What indicators were cited?
- What user-friendly title are we going to use for this?
- What stakeholders are directly involved?
- What are the root causes of this goal?
- What value do we want to create (in terms of institutional effectiveness and people flourishing)? How will we measure that?
- What are our operating assumptions about _____ (topic of the goal)?
- What are 5 things that will help us? What are 5 things that could hinder us?
- What 1-3 accountability structures will we use?
- Given the major recommendation, commentary, and indicators, what are 5 or more key deliverables? (What does “done” look like?)
- How much time will the average person involved in the plan need to invest?
- Who’s involved in collaboratively developing the improvement plan for this major recommendation?
If we had used these 4 steps (instead of 2 steps: complete the visit and develop the plan), we would have made more progress, been more helpful, been more likely to make an actual difference in terms of institutionally effectiveness and getting people flourishing.
Here are some related resources:
- When you want to more effectively improve, what do you need to do?
- How clear are you on the value you want to create through a given school improvement goal? (Hint: Use ChatGPT!)
- Leaders, what 3 things can you do to be even more successful at school improvement?
- International Christian school leaders, 70% of change initiatives are unsuccessful! How can you avoid your change initiative being part of that 70%?
- What steps have you taken in the past 12 months that actually helped you and your international Christian school colleagues do school improvement better?
And here’s what I’m learning about Step 3: Scope Statement from Project Management for the Unofficial Project Manager:
- “…a smart project leader starts with the assumption that nothing is clear” (loc 570).
- “Without a clear and shared picture of the value you’re trying to create, the project is doomed” (loc 561).
- “You’ve got to make sure that everybody sees the same picture of your project’s outcome. Its value must be clear and unquestionable to the people involved” (loc 567).
What about you? After your accreditation visit, what’s your next step? How might reviewing your improvement engine and establishing a scope statement increase the likelihood of your improvement goal not being part of the 70% that aren’t achieved? What will you do?
Bottom line: After your accreditation visit is done, review your improvement engine, establish a scope statement for the major recommendation, and then develop your plan.
Get flourishing!
Michael